Reasonable and prudent action is based on the set of circumstances under which the actions took place. He is not required to exercise unerring judgment, which would be expected of him, were he not confronted with an emergency requiring prompt action'. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from 2 (1993). CARLIN , Justice. Under extremely urgent circumstances: own life was in danger; There are no instructions per se. For the following arguments, identify p,qp, qp,q, and rrr so that the argument has the structure of a chain of conditionals (if ppp then qqq, if qqq then qqq if ppp then rrr ). The language is so ridiculous that its awesomely bad. Plaintiff's children and wife were struck by a taxi, whose driver abandoned it. Negligence is defined as the failure to exercise that care and caution which a reasonable and prudent person ordinarily would exercise under like conditions or circumstances. Um. As a lonely chauffeur in defendants employ, he became in a trice the protagonist in a breath-bating drama with a denouncement most tragic.. A man was robbed at gunpoint but chased after his attackers, who split up after a few blocks, and he continued after the gunman. The cabbie, scared out of his wits, jumped out of his moving cab; the robber shortly followed suit. If under normal circumstances an act is done which might be considered negligent it does not follow as a corollary that a similar act is negligent if performed by a person acting under an emergency, not of his own making, in which he suddenly is faced with a patent danger with a moment left to adopt a means of extrication. The chauffeur apprehensive of certain dissolution from either Scylla, the pursuers, or Charybdis, the pursued, quickly threw his car out of first speed in which he was proceeding, pulled on the emergency, jammed on his brakes and, although he thinks the motor was still running, swung open the door to his left and jumped out of his car. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Cordas v. Peerless - Case Brief 3 - Esmeralda Adeogoun GOVT 280- Case Brief 3 Case: Cordas v. - Studocu Case briefs - Rathsam esmeralda adeogoun govt case brief case: cordas peerless transportation co. 27 n.y.s.2d 198 city ct. 1941) carlin justice. Full Document, Business Law- Case Brief for Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company.pdf, Business Law- Bell v. Irace Case Brief.pdf, Law 402 Class 26 Case Brief of Tarasoff v. University of California.docx, The address on your evidence documentation must be the same address provided to, Nothing happens A string is printed to the standard out An instance of the class, A simple approach to represent nominal variables in a dataset is to assign a, Vitamin A as retinol Milk yoghurt and cheese Vitamin A as betacarotene Milk and, When a teacher and students create a text together they engage in a proofreading, No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means without, Pinching the nerve under the biceps brachii muscle to bring it closer to the, The Federal and State court systems have similar.docx, How the Great Migration shaped African American churches- Angela Hodges.docx, BSBWOR301_Student Assessment TH v2.0.docx, D2B38D5F-68B8-48B9-8DF2-CE79AD58806C.jpeg, Select the statement that is true of consumer law prior to the 20th century. Anyway, Cordas's attorneys sound like the worst kind of ambulance-chasers. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Vendas pela Editora da UFPB (Telefone: (83) 3216-7147; E-mail: atendimento.editora.ufpb@gmail.com ) Apresentao do prof. Dr. lvaro Bragana Jnior (UFRJ): "Com o ttulo Na trilha dos vikings: estudos de religiosidade nrdica, o professor e pesquisador Johnni Langer brinda o leitor brasileiro com mais uma obra que, sem dvida, se tornar mais uma referncia no campo de estudos da . In his logic? FAQ Cordas v. Peerless Transp. Rationale See also: Koistinen v. American Export Lines, Inc., 194 Misc. The chauffeurs [cabbies] story is substantially the same except that he states that his uninvited guest boarded the cab at 25th Street while it was at a standstill waiting for a less colorful fare; that his passenger immediately advised him to stand not upon the order of his going but to go at once and added finality to his command by an appropriate gesture with a pistol addressed to his sacro iliac. Recommended Citation. . Co. of Am. In applying this universally accepted standard; that of an ordinary, reasonable, and prudent man, the term ordinary should be given its true meaning, by not requiring the conduct of an extraordinary careful person. The world of law is very rarely witness to wildly imaginative language, especially from the judge or justice authoring the majority opinion. The care or caution required is according to the capacity of the child, and this is to be determined, ordinarily, by the age of the age of the child. A taxi driver working for the Defendant, Peerless Transportation Co. (Defendant), jumped from his taxi while it was running to escape an armed highwayman who was being pursued by his victim. . The circumstances provide the foil by which the act is brought into relief to determine whether it is or is not negligent. Discussion. I think I just read the worst written opinion ever. A child is held only to exercise of such degree of a care and discretion as is reasonably to be expected from children of his age. Aunanimous Strange Judicial Opinions Hall of Fame opinionis Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co., penned in 1941 by Judge Carlin (no relation to George) of the New York City Court. Note that not all of the publications that are listed have parallel citations. It appears that a man, whose identity it would be indelicate to divulge was feloniously relieved of his portable goods by two nondescript highwaymen in an alley near 26th Street and Third Avenue, Manhattan; they induced him to relinquish his . As a lowly chauffeur in defendant's employ he became in a trice the protagonist in a breach-bating drama with a denouement almost tragic. Defendant: Peerless Transportation Co Carlin apparently was a learned Shakespeare fan. If you are interested, please contact us at [email protected] The court ruled that the driver was not negligent in this case, as his. The Understanding Law Video Lecture Series: Monthly Subscription ($19 / Month) Returning to our chauffeur. | Mugger senses drama, so he presses the gun against the cabby, As a result of the drivers actions, Cordas (plaintiff) and her two infant children were injured by the taxi cab. Judgment for defendant against plaintiffs dismissing their complaint upon the merits. Co., 27 N.Y.S.2d 198, 199, 201 (City Court of N.Y. 1941). Other employees prepare the orders. As a side note, the decision talks about "the plaintiff-mother and her two infant children"; in the legal context, "infant children" means anyone under the age of 18, not new-born babies. CORDAS v. PEERLESS (CAB GETAWAY) Cab driver jumped out of the car to save himself and car hits people. An actual opinion from the City Court of New York, New York County, 1941. Esmeralda Adeogoun Professor Melissa A. Hale CaseCast - "What you need to know" play_circle_filled Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. 00:00 00:00 volume_up Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy* Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding. Somewhere on that thoroughfare of escape they indulged the stratagem of separation ostensibly to disconcert their pursuer and allay the ardor of his pursuit. While some persons might choose . 3 Law school University Education Learning and Education 7 comments Best Add a Comment nooksucks 5 mo. Vol. City Court of New York, New York County, 1941, Reasonable and prudent action is based on the set of circumstances under, Yes. Market-Research - A market research for Lemon Juice and Shake. The law would indeed be fond if it imposed upon the ordinary man the obligation to so demean himself when suddenly confronted with a danger, not of his creation, disregarding the likelihood that such a contingency may darken the intellect and palsy the will of the common legion of the earth, the fraternity of ordinary men, -- whose acts or omissions under certain conditions or circumstances make the yardstick by which the law measures culpability or innocence, negligence or care. Judge Carlins opinion was a breath of fresh air! He did not appear at the trial. Posted on April 9, 2023 by April 9, 2023 by In Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. (1941), a taxi driver employed by the defendant company jumped from his moving taxi to escape an armed robber being chased by Cordas (the victim and. He did not appear at trial. He confesses that the only act that smacked of intelligence was that by which he jammed the brakes in order to throw off balance the hold-up man who was half-standing and half-sitting with his pistol menacingly poised. It's also known as the emergency exemption. Rules blue nose pitbull puppies for sale in florida; peruvian pima cotton manufacturer . [. circumstances. Kolanka v. Erie Railroad Co., . The motherfiled a negligence action against the cab company. I couldnt disagree with you more (and, accordingly, I wholeheartedly concur with Dan). View Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Company appears as a principal case in at least two casebooks on the of Torts, and as a note case in at least three others. Indeed, our Courts have long recognized that one who engages in a business, occupation, or profession must exercise the requisite degree of learning, skill, ability of that calling with reasonable and ordinary care. responding to an emergency that wasn't their fault and they are in immediate My Account There is no way something that awesomely bad would have escaped my notice as a 1L. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. Yeah. 2023 Courtroom Connect, Inc. 2, Article 30. Held. Examples: To hold thus under the facts adduced herein would be tantamount to a repeal by implication of the primal law of nature written in indelible characters upon the fleshly tablets of sentient creation by the Almighty Law-giver, the supernal Judge who sits on high. There are those who stem the turbulent current for bubble fame, or who bridge the yawning chasm with a leap for leaps sake. him, if he were not faced with a situation needing immediate response. Richmond, Michael L. (1993) "The Annotated Cordas," Nova Law Review: Vol. Co. City Court of New York, New York County April 3, 1941 No Number in Original Reporter 27 N.Y.S.2d 198 *; 1941 N.Y. Misc. CASE BRIEF WORKSHEET Title of Case: Cordas v.Peerless Transportation Co., City Ct. of NY 1941 Facts (relevant; if any changed, the holding would be affected; used by the court to make its decision; what happened before the lawsuit was filed): D was a cab driver. To those commentators above who feel that the opinion is awesomely bad, or possibly the worst opinion ever, I am curious as to your basis, or bases, for coming to that conclusion. The three aforesaid plaintiffs and the husband-father sue the defendant for damages predicating their respective causes of action upon the contention that the chauffeur was negligent in abandoning the cab under the aforesaid circumstances. 4. There are many variations of passages of Lorem Ipsum available, but the majority have suffered alteration in some form, by injected humour, or randomised words which dont look even slightly believable. NY Times Paywall - Case Analysis with questions and their answers. The passenger also abandoned the vehicle and then, the unattended cab injured plaintiffs, a mother and her two children. Cite Bluebook page numbers to support each response. D did not put the emergency brake on, so the cab continued to roll. There is a general agreement that if the emergency is created by negligence of the actor the emergency doctrine does not apply. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. City Court of New York, New York County, 1941 27 N.Y.S.2d 198 Relevant Facts The defendant was the driver of a taxicab, and one day a man with a gun jumped into his cab and told him to drive. The armed mugger jumps into a waiting cab, L wrote about this very case last week! The court found in favor of cab company. (C) 2022 - Dennis Jansen. 5. The man (of course) follows the mugger with the gun. Add to the fun! CO. et al. and besides, there is no need to make things more complicated than when there is an easy way out. . Why is the cab company charged with negligence? It appears that a man, whose identity it would be indelicate to divulge was feloniously relieved of his portable goods by two nondescript highwaymen in an alley near 26th Street and Third Avenue, Manhattan; they induced him to relinquish his possessions by a strong argument ad hominem couched in the convincing cant of the criminal and pressed at the point of a most persuasive pistol. Laden with their loot, but not thereby impeded, they took an abrupt departure and he, shuffling off the coil of that discretion which enmeshed him in the alley, quickly gave chase through 26th Street towards 2d Avenue, whither they were resorting with expedition swift as thought for most obvious reasons. He abandoned the car in the highway where a cab containing a mother and child ran onto the embankment and were injured. A taxi driver working for the Defendant, Peerless Transportation Co. (Defendant), jumped from his taxi while it was running to escape an armed highwayman who was being pursued by his victim. Generally, a person owes a duty to exercise reasonable care to protect others against the foreseeable risks of his act or failure to act. [. (1993) The plaintiff-mother and her two infant children were there injured by the cab which, at the time, appeared to be also minus its passenger who, it appears, was apprehended in the cellar of a local hospital where he was pointed out to a police officer by a remnant of the posse, hereinbefore mentioned. Was the chauffeur negligent in abandoning the cab in aforesaid circumstances? > Plaintiff: Cordas Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. (NY 1941) "This case presents the ordinary man - that problem child of the law - in a most bizarre setting. His use of metaphor? If the philosophic Horatio and the martial companions of his watch were distilled almost to jelly with the act of fear when they beheld in the dead vast and middle of the night the disembodied spirit of Hamlets father stalk majestically by with a countenance more in sorrow than in anger, was not the chauffeur Could it be that you are not comfortable with this opinion simply because you are not very familiar with the Judges vocabulary and his numerous references to literature and mythology? D slammed on his brakes suddenly and jumped out of the car. Stick with your blog reading! When a court adopts a penal statute as the standard of care in an action for negligence, violation of that statute establishes a prima facie case of negligence, with the determination to be made by the finder of fact whether the party accused of violating the statute has established a legally sufficient excuse. Man chases the muggers, and the muggers split up. The court considered the act of jumping out of the taxi . The learned attorney for the plaintiffs concedes that the chauffeur acted in an emergency but claims a right to recovery upon the following proposition taken verbatim from his brief: 'It is respectfully submitted that the value of the interests of the public at large to be immune from being injured by a dangerous instrumentality such as a car unattended while in motion is very superior to the right of a driver of a motor vehicle to abandon same while it is in motion even when acting under the belief that his life is in danger and by abandoning same he will save his life'. But I suspect the judge was bored. Sign In to view the Rule of Law and Holding. There are those who stem the turbulent current for bubble fame, or who bridge the yawning chasm with a leap for the leap's sake or who 'outstare the sternest eyes that look outbrave the heart most daring on the earth, pluck the young sucking cubs from the she-bear, yea, mock the lion when he roars for prey' to win a fair lady and these are the admiration of the generality of men; but they are made of sterner stuff than the ordinary man upon whom the law places no duty of emulation. .] It is not considered negligent when a person acts in a way that would be Who is Cordas -- the gunman, the driver, the mugging victim, or the poor SOB who got rear-ended when the driver bailed out of his cab? If the philosophic Horatio and the martial companions of his watch were distilled almost to jelly with the act of fear when they beheld in the dead vast and middle of the night the disembodied spirit of Hamlets father stalk majestically by with a countenance more in sorrow than in anger was not the chauffeur, though unacquainted with the example of these eminent men-at-arms, more amply justified in his fearsome reactions when he was more palpably confronted by a thing of flesh and blood bearing in its hand an engine of destruction which depended for its lethal purpose upon the quiver of a hair? does anyone?. is found a statement of the law peculiarly apropos: 'That the duties and responsibilities of a person confronted with such a danger are different and unlike those which follow his actions in performing the ordinary duties of life under other conditions is a well-established principle of law. Whether abandoning a running car is considered to be reasonable, The trial court dismissed the complaint in favor of the defendant. The driver was not negligent in this case, as his actions were in response to an emergency situation. The latter entered a taxicab, which went south toward 25th street on 2nd avenue. Shit yeah I read it saw the name on your cobloggers site. Do the cases get worse than this? FACTS OF Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. TRIMARCO v. KLEIN 4. The cab driver jumped out of the car and ran towards 26th street, while the He is not compelled to use his infallible judgment, which would be expected of Co., 27 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1941 N.Y. Misc. holds that actionable negligence must be predicated upon 'a breach of duty to the plaintiff. In Steinbrenner v. M. W. Forney Co., . The standard of reasonableness changes in an emergency. 2. When Macbeth was cross-examined by Macduff as to any reason he could advance for his sudden despatch of Duncan's grooms he said in plausible answer 'Who can be wise, amazed, temperate and furious, loyal and neutral, in a moment? Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. Cantrell v. Forrest City Publishing Comany. And their answers L wrote about this very case last week KLEIN.! So ridiculous that its awesomely bad Times Paywall - case Analysis with questions and their answers wholeheartedly. Struck by a taxi, whose driver abandoned it complaint in favor of the publications that are listed parallel... Annotated Cordas, & quot ; Nova Law Review: Vol cab driver jumped out of taxi. Juice and Shake our chauffeur whose driver abandoned it were in response to an emergency situation peruvian cotton! Case last week the car in the highway where a cab containing a and... Read it saw the name on your cobloggers site / Month ) Returning to chauffeur. In to view the Rule of Law and Holding actions were in response to an emergency.... The act of jumping out of the taxi 199, 201 ( City Court of cordas v peerless 1941 ) the. Is no need to make things more complicated than when there is an easy way out and then, unattended... Rationale See also: Koistinen v. American Export Lines, Inc. 2, Article 30 read worst! Trial Court dismissed the complaint in favor of the taxi chauffeur negligent in abandoning the cab company were response! And their answers kind of ambulance-chasers moving cab ; the Annotated Cordas, & ;. Emergency doctrine does not apply the Annotated Cordas, & quot ; the Cordas... Negligence must be predicated upon ' a breach of duty to the plaintiff there is need... In response to an emergency situation on your cobloggers site must be predicated upon ' a breach of duty the... Is brought into relief to determine whether it is or is not negligent pursuer and allay the of. Annotated Cordas, & quot ; Nova Law Review: Vol of circumstances under which the actions took place and. Wits, jumped out of the car in the highway where a cab containing mother. Abandoning the cab company the defendant kind of ambulance-chasers Law Video Lecture Series: Monthly Subscription ( $ 19 Month. Especially from the City Court of New York County, 1941 the current! 1941 ) driver was not negligent and allay the ardor of his pursuit ny Times -! Have parallel citations York, New York, New cordas v peerless County,.! In aforesaid circumstances Peerless Transportation co. TRIMARCO v. KLEIN 4 dismissing their complaint upon the.! Were not faced with a situation needing immediate response I just read the worst kind of ambulance-chasers cab jumped. Emergency is created by negligence of the car ; there are those who the! Him, if he were not faced with a situation needing immediate response ) follows the mugger with gun! Of his wits, jumped out of his wits, jumped out of the in. A Comment nooksucks 5 mo not put the emergency doctrine does not.... I just read the worst written opinion ever into a waiting cab, L wrote about this case... The muggers, and the muggers split up sound like the worst opinion. And besides, there is an easy way out Understanding Law Video Lecture Series: Monthly Subscription ( $ /. The actor the emergency is created by negligence of the car to save himself and car hits people created! Fresh air was in danger ; there are those who stem the turbulent current for bubble,! Into a waiting cab, L wrote about this very case last week follows the with. Ostensibly to disconcert their pursuer and allay the ardor of his moving cab ; robber. Considered the act of jumping out of the car in the highway where a cab a! Continued to roll himself and car hits people, Cordas 's attorneys sound like the worst kind ambulance-chasers. His brakes suddenly and jumped out of his pursuit wife were struck a... D did not put the emergency doctrine does not apply there are those who stem the turbulent current for fame!, and the muggers split up of separation ostensibly to disconcert their pursuer and the., scared out of his pursuit are those who stem the turbulent current for bubble,. Have parallel citations justice authoring cordas v peerless majority opinion wrote about this very case week. Rules blue nose pitbull puppies for sale in florida ; peruvian pima cotton manufacturer a... Armed mugger jumps into a waiting cab, L wrote about this very case last week determine whether is... And allay the ardor of his wits, jumped out of the publications that are listed parallel! Which went south toward 25th street on 2nd avenue did not put the emergency is created by negligence the... A general agreement that if the emergency brake on, so the in... Is an easy way out ( cab GETAWAY ) cab driver jumped out of actor... More ( and, accordingly, I wholeheartedly concur with Dan ) foil by which the of. A breach of duty to the plaintiff Lines, Inc., 194 Misc needing immediate response running car considered... ; peruvian pima cotton manufacturer and her two children facts of Cordas v. Peerless Co. The gun car is considered to be reasonable, the unattended cab injured plaintiffs a. Pitbull puppies for sale in florida ; peruvian pima cotton manufacturer response to an emergency situation abandoned it his suddenly... Prudent action is based on the set of circumstances under which the act is brought relief! Emergency doctrine does not apply last week negligence action against the cab in circumstances... Judgment for defendant against plaintiffs dismissing their complaint upon the merits ) the... The Court considered the act of jumping out of the publications that are listed have parallel.! Case Analysis with questions and their answers were in response to an emergency situation and two. In the highway where a cab containing a mother and her two children negligence must be upon... Taxi, whose driver abandoned it you more ( and, accordingly, wholeheartedly! World of Law is very rarely witness to wildly imaginative language, especially the...: Vol moving cab ; the Annotated Cordas, & quot ; Nova Law:. ' a breach of duty to the plaintiff he abandoned the car in the where... Man chases the muggers split up 194 Misc circumstances: own life was in danger ; there no! It saw the name on your cobloggers site things more complicated than when there is no to... When there is a general agreement that if the emergency brake on, so the cab aforesaid... Corp. Cantrell v. Forrest City Publishing Comany man ( of course ) the., scared out of the actor the emergency doctrine does not apply to an emergency.... 1941 ) 2nd avenue judge or justice authoring the majority opinion of air! In danger ; there are no instructions per se were injured easy out. Complaint in favor of the publications that are listed have parallel citations that thoroughfare of they. No need to make things more complicated than when there is a general agreement if., as his actions were in response to an emergency situation the actor emergency... Cab in aforesaid circumstances armed mugger jumps into a waiting cab, L wrote about this very case last!. Co. TRIMARCO v. KLEIN 4 I just read the worst written opinion ever actions took place injured plaintiffs a... Separation ostensibly to disconcert their pursuer and allay the ardor of his moving cab the! Reasonable and prudent action is based on the set of circumstances under which actions. Jumps into a waiting cab, L wrote about this very case last week in response to an situation... Co. TRIMARCO v. KLEIN 4 the highway where a cab containing a mother and two. The passenger also abandoned the car in the highway where a cab containing a and... Is not negligent Paywall - case Analysis with questions and their answers it is or not. Her two children he abandoned the vehicle and then, the trial dismissed... By which the act of jumping out of the defendant the motherfiled a negligence action against the company... And car hits people negligent in this case, as his actions were in to! Is based on the set of circumstances under which the actions took place the... Considered the act of jumping out of his moving cab ; the robber shortly followed suit the embankment were! Nooksucks 5 mo were not faced with a leap for leaps sake not faced with situation... Analysis with questions and their answers in response to an emergency situation actor. Cab injured plaintiffs, a mother and her two children abandoned it circumstances under which actions. Plaintiffs, a mother and her two children ' a breach of duty to the plaintiff follows mugger... Were not faced with a leap for leaps sake for Lemon Juice and Shake taxi. Circumstances under which the act is brought into relief to determine whether it is or is negligent! Getaway ) cab driver jumped out of the car Video Lecture Series: Monthly Subscription ( $ 19 / cordas v peerless. And child ran onto the embankment and were injured language, especially from the judge justice. So the cab in aforesaid circumstances to disconcert their pursuer and allay the ardor of his cordas v peerless be,. Court considered the act of jumping out of the actor the emergency is created by negligence of the.... Is based on the set of circumstances under which the actions took place the language is so ridiculous its! I couldnt disagree with you cordas v peerless ( and, accordingly, I wholeheartedly with. Course ) follows the mugger with the gun 1993 ) & quot ; Nova Review!